Despite the entrance of new competition in years since GitKraken’s initial release, our speed, performance, and functionality (not to mention our mascot, Keif), continue to satisfy and delight our growing user base of millions of developers around the world.īut don’t take our word for it. We let our developers loose to build the greatest Git GUI the digital world had ever seen. One that could quickly show who was doing what, to which file, on any project one that could help expedite individual workflows and improve team collaboration one that visually blew the minds of everyone who interacted with it.
GITKRAKEN VS SMARTGIT SOFTWARE
But GK does all the big (most used) Git actions, and does them well above average, at least for me.The GitKraken Git GUI was one of the first software products of its kind to hit the market in August 2014, built by Axosoft developers who were on a mission to find a Git GUI that didn’t suck. So many things come down to personal preference. I've been using GitKraken since it was in Beta, and even in those days it was very usable. File a bug report.Īnd 6: This was answered in a different comment, but here's the link to get an invite for anyone who's lazy like me:
GITKRAKEN VS SMARTGIT HOW TO
One of them is handling the '.git' folder differently than GK is, and GK doesn't know how to manage that. This sounds more like a personal issue than anything else, just my opinion.įor 5: I think that has to do with the fact that you use multiple Git clients. I'd imagine most people don't run into that problem.įor 4 There's a progress indicator when you clone a project, which seems to me like the only necessary time you'd actually need one. If you're cleaning up branches and keeping the repo at a decent size, you shouldn't have any issues with speed or crashing.įor 3, that sounds like a feature you could probably request. That same repo used to be over 1gb, and only then was GK super slow. How big are your repos, that it's crashing every 2 minutes? Or, what OS/version are you on? It's blazing fast for me, but the biggest repo I have is around 200mb. If someone knows of a client where I get to keep the nice and understandable branching graphical interface, while being actually usable, please let me know. It is something I almost certainly can no longer live without. Now that my rant is over, you may be thinking, why don't I just use SmartGit or SourceTree? Or even git bash? The most frustrating thing is the graphical interface for branching is easily the best that I've seen, and integrates with git flow so well in my opinion. Good luck googling that issue you're having with it.
There are no community revolving around gitkraken at all. I have to open the repo in a different git client to have them fix the issue instead. "Unable to find compatible repository" every other day, usually after every other reset of commits.
No progress bar when pushing, no progress bars when commiting, nothing.
This is something extremely trivial on SmartGit (ctrl+a -> rightclick -> resolve). When projects have 50+ meta file conflicts, GitKraken expects you to click on every single file, open up their conflict solver (which takes 2-10 seconds just to open, and again to save) and only then do you get to resolve conflicts. Simple discarding of changes or resetting of commits or even just pushing new commits easily take up to twice the amount of time or more when compared to SmartGit or SourceTree.Ĭan't select multiple files when resolving conflicts. It is incredibly slow (yes, even in ver 2.5 which was supposed to be much faster). And when I say crash, I mean freeze at a infinite loading screen loop that will stay that way forever with no error or crash messages. Here is a non-exhaustive list of reasons why: I have been using GitKraken for a good 3 months now, and compared to something like SmartGit, it is one of the most frustrating git clients I've ever come across.
0 kommentar(er)
